Check out this article from the former CEO of Lockheed Martin, Norm Augustine about America losing its edge in innovation. Things need to change… now!
Suggest Rather Than Propose
For a fairly long time, I've been a staunch proponent of the idea that the way in which one "wraps" a presentation (i.e., the way something is said or presented) is equally as important, if not more important, than "what's in the box" (i.e., the actual content of the presentation). I've always found this particularly true when group problem solving or group work from my college days.
It seems now that there is some research to back this up (perhaps there always has been but I just didn't know about it). This article states that:
Psychologists have found that the more assertively you express an idea, the more likely it is the person hearing it will resist it.
A suggestion might come in the form of "What would happen if…" whereas a proposal might come in the form of "If I were you, I would …".
GREAT Speech by JK Rowling
I just finished watching JK Rowling's 2008 Harvard University Commencement Speech. She is amazing. I can't claim to be a huge fan of the Harry Potter movement, mostly due to the fact that I've not read the books or seen the movies, but I've always been impressed when hearing her speak. The title of her talk is The Fringe Benefits of Failure. Personally, I know that I must remind myself routinely that failure is not a bad thing, and I feel strongly that this is something that we must inculcate in our students. One of my favorite quotes from Ms. Rowling's speech is this:
Had I really succeeded at anything else, I might never have found the determination to succeed in the one arena I believed I truly belonged.
If you have a minute, take a look at the video or transcript.
J.K. Rowling Speaks at Harvard Commencement from Harvard Magazine on Vimeo.
Practical Research
A good friend, Chris Christensen (Twitter: @minenet) responded to one of my tweets concerning innovation education with a link to a blog post which discusses the great divide between university research and industry application. It is definitely a good read and brings up some interesting questions. While I know that research should be on the cutting edge of the cutting edge, it should in some way have some applicability, too, right?
With respect to computer science research, Todd Hoff, author of of the article, makes a good point that there really isn't any impetus for a researcher to take a good idea to a full robust implementation. I've heard of this notion referred to as "research code", code in which an scientific-paper author implements a novel algorithm, gathers some results, writes the paper, then moves on. On some level, this is how the system is structured, though. Tenure and promotion with respect to research is very much judged on the number of publications, not the quality of a robust algorithm implementation that is posted on sourceforge or github.
Perhaps though, there is an opportunity here. There's a huge push to get undergraduates involved in research as early as possible. A great first experience might be to become involved with fleshing out implementation of cool things that can be posted for others to review. I've seen positive results of undergrad students who had the opportunity to work in a research lab, so I'm all for getting them in the labs.
One other thing, Hoff brings up the idea of some way to increase collaboration between university research and industry applications. There is an National Science Foundation program that supports this idea. More info on the Industry & University Cooperative Research Program (I/UCRC) can be found at their website. Here is some background on the program:
The National Science Foundation's (NSF's) Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers (I/UCRC) Program is influencing positive change in the performance capacity of the U.S. industrial enterprise. Over the past two decades, the I/UCRCs have led the way to a new era of partnership between universities and industry, featuring high-quality,industrially relevant fundamental research, strong industrial support of and collaboration in research and education, and direct transfer of universitydeveloped ideas, research results, and technology to U.S. industry to improve its competitive posture in world markets. Through innovative education of talented graduate and undergraduate students, the I/UCRCs are providing the next generation of scientists and engineers with a broad, industrially oriented perspective on engineering research and practice.
Lots of interesting things to think about…
Caveat: I'm not a research faculty member; I'm a teaching faculty member. So I probably don't know everything about research, funding, publications, etc. that someone who's been a research faculty member for many years would know.
Teaching Innovation
Maybe you know… I've been interested in innovation in engineering education for the past year or so. I've been reading quite a bit about innovation, creativity, and such as it pertains to engineering education but education in general as well. I should indicate here that I'm not really talking about teaching innovations (new and great ways of teaching). I want to help students become more innovative or hone the skills that aid in innovation. Teaching innovations are important and fun to think about as well. But that's for another blog post later.
While I've been reading about this for some time, I thought I'd ask the question Is it possible to teach innovation to college students? on twitter. Now, I'm relatively new to Twitter. I've had an account for some time, but never really got into it. Its time to change that. In any event, Chris Sundberg initially responded via Twitter that it is not possible to teach innovation. He later went on to write a great blog post about teaching innovation. Essentially, he broke innovation down into some components/traits/skills: creativity, being a polymath, execution, and risk. Over my time researching innovation, I've seen and thought about each of these. However, Chris' blog post got me to thinking about the fact that we should be nurturing each of these traits, not just one, to lead students to be more innovative.
Chris also links to some interesting books. You should check out his blog posts.
Great Quote about Writing
I just ran across a quote about writing from William Strunk’s The Elements of Style:
Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell.
Communication (in this case via the written word) is a vitally important skill for everyone.
Welcome
Welcome to my website. I’m currently re-doing the whole thing using WordPress 3.0 and will be using it as a course management system for my fall 2010 courses. More to come soon…